Thanks, I realized just now that I introduced this.
Manuel
On Fri, 2026-05-29 at 10:10 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> The first parameter should match the variable that the allocated memory
> is assigned to. Fix the example accordingly, the one for kmalloc_obj got
> it right already.
>
> Fixes: 7c6d969d5349 ("Documentation: adopt new coding style of type-aware
> kmalloc-
> family")
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
> ---
> Documentation/process/coding-style.rst | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst
> b/Documentation/process/coding-
> style.rst
> index a3bf75dc7c88..a8336582f60b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst
> @@ -959,13 +959,13 @@ The preferred form for allocating an array is the
> following:
>
> .. code-block:: c
>
> - p = kmalloc_objs(*ptr, n, ...);
> + p = kmalloc_objs(*p, n, ...);
>
> The preferred form for allocating a zeroed array is the following:
>
> .. code-block:: c
>
> - p = kzalloc_objs(*ptr, n, ...);
> + p = kzalloc_objs(*p, n, ...);
>
> Both forms check for overflow on the allocation size n * sizeof(...),
> and return NULL if that occurred.
>
> base-commit: f7af91adc230aa99e23330ecf85bc9badd9780ad
