On Wed, Jun 03, 2026 at 11:33:27AM +0200, Philipp Stanner wrote: > > > > and Philipp can use the `RcuKBox` in this patchset. We also need to impl > > > > InPlaceInit for RcuBox, but that can be added later. > > > > > > So shall we merge my series with Alice's patch, and later we add your > > > patch and other features, or would you prefer to have the additional > > > boxes from your patch from the get-go? > > > > > > > I would like to have it from the get-go mainly because of RcuBox vs > > RcuKBox naming. Thank you! > > Fine by me. Just process-wise: how should we do it? > > I could include your patch on top of Alice's. Would be a bit more > consistent regarding the git-workflow if we'd squash the two patches, > but then you two would have to agree on authorship. >
Keeping it as a separate patch is fine by me. Regards, Boqun > All is fine by me, but I wanted to ask instead of just do A or B. > > [...]
