From: Jesse Taube <[email protected]> Zicclsm requires misaligned support for all regular load and store instructions, both scalar and vector, but not AMOs or other specialized forms of memory access, to main memory regions with both the cacheability and coherence PMAs, as defined in the profiles spec. Even though mandated, misaligned loads and stores might execute extremely slowly. Standard software distributions should assume their existence only for correctness, not for performance.
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Andy Chiu <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Charlie Jenkins <[email protected]> Tested-by: Charlie Jenkins <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jesse Taube <[email protected]> [Rebased, rewrote doc text, minor commit message revisions] Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Guodong Xu <[email protected]> --- v3: - Move the hwprobe.rst entry to the IMA_EXT_1 section so its documentation matches the IMA_EXT_1 bit it was allocated in v2 (Sashiko, agreed by Andrew). v2: - Rebased onto v7.1-rc2; moved ZICCLSM to IMA_EXT_1 and allocated a new bit for it --- Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst | 4 ++++ arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h | 1 + arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h | 1 + arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 1 + arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c | 1 + 5 files changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst b/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst index 3cedaaa53f331..fa2810bfc1477 100644 --- a/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst +++ b/Documentation/arch/riscv/hwprobe.rst @@ -401,3 +401,7 @@ The following keys are defined: as defined in version 1.0 of the RISC-V Control-flow Integrity (CFI) extensions specification, ratified in commit ff03d8485a04 ("Update to ratified state") of riscv-cfi. + + * :c:macro:`RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZICCLSM`: The Zicclsm extension is supported, + as defined in the RISC-V Profiles specification starting from commit + b1d80660 ("Updated to ratified state.") diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h index 44bf8c7d8acc5..e8f4a7dd96a93 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h @@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZCLSD 103 #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICFILP 104 #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICFISS 105 +#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICCLSM 106 #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_XLINUXENVCFG 127 diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h index 9139edba0aecb..6819df159c51e 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/hwprobe.h @@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ struct riscv_hwprobe { #define RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_ZICBOP_BLOCK_SIZE 15 #define RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_IMA_EXT_1 16 #define RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZICFISS (1ULL << 0) +#define RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZICCLSM (1ULL << 1) /* Increase RISCV_HWPROBE_MAX_KEY when adding items. */ diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c index 686dde3ce3b98..1fb595581adcf 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c @@ -502,6 +502,7 @@ const struct riscv_isa_ext_data riscv_isa_ext[] = { __RISCV_ISA_EXT_SUPERSET_VALIDATE(zicbom, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOM, riscv_xlinuxenvcfg_exts, riscv_ext_zicbom_validate), __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA_VALIDATE(zicbop, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOP, riscv_ext_zicbop_validate), __RISCV_ISA_EXT_SUPERSET_VALIDATE(zicboz, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICBOZ, riscv_xlinuxenvcfg_exts, riscv_ext_zicboz_validate), + __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(zicclsm, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICCLSM), __RISCV_ISA_EXT_DATA(ziccrse, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICCRSE), __RISCV_ISA_EXT_SUPERSET_VALIDATE(zicfilp, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZICFILP, riscv_xlinuxenvcfg_exts, riscv_cfilp_validate), diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c index f8f68ba781b45..9cf62266f1890 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c @@ -205,6 +205,7 @@ static void hwprobe_isa_ext1(struct riscv_hwprobe *pair, * in the hart_isa bitmap, are made. */ EXT_KEY(isainfo->isa, ZICFISS, pair->value, missing); + EXT_KEY(isainfo->isa, ZICCLSM, pair->value, missing); } /* Now turn off reporting features if any CPU is missing it. */ -- 2.43.0
