On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 05:06:16PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Same change as the previous patch but for alloc_swap_folio: > pass vmf->address directly instead of ALIGN_DOWN(vmf->address, ...). >
Rather than reference other patches, just explain the contents of this patch. otherwise... > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]> > Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-6 > Assisted-by: cursor-agent:GPT-5.4-xhigh Reviewed-by: Gregory Price <[email protected]> > --- > mm/memory.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c > index 0824441a6ba1..74523bc00d8a 100644 > --- a/mm/memory.c > +++ b/mm/memory.c > @@ -4734,8 +4734,7 @@ static struct folio *alloc_swap_folio(struct vm_fault > *vmf) > /* Try allocating the highest of the remaining orders. */ > gfp = vma_thp_gfp_mask(vma); > while (orders) { > - addr = ALIGN_DOWN(vmf->address, PAGE_SIZE << order); > - folio = vma_alloc_folio(gfp, order, vma, addr); > + folio = vma_alloc_folio(gfp, order, vma, vmf->address); > if (folio) { > if (!mem_cgroup_swapin_charge_folio(folio, vma->vm_mm, > gfp, entry)) > -- > MST >
