On 1/12/26 05:33, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Fri, Jan 09, 2026 at 11:14:54AM +0100, Simon Schippers wrote: >> Am I not allowed to stop the queue and then return NETDEV_TX_BUSY? > > We jump through a lot of hoops in virtio_net to avoid using > NETDEV_TX_BUSY because that bypasses all the net/ cleverness. > Given your patches aim to improve precisely ring full, > I would say stopping proactively before NETDEV_TX_BUSY > should be a priority. >
I already proactively stop here with the approach you proposed in the v6. Or am I missing something (apart from the xdp path)? And yes I also dislike returning NETDEV_TX_BUSY but I do not see how this can be prevented with lltx enabled.

