On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 03:55:47PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 9/17/25 3:09 AM, Paul Sajna wrote:
> > The original bootloader (fastboot) requires board and MSM IDs in order
> > to boot the kernel, so these have been added. When re-using the same
> > files to chainload U-Boot, these compatibles are also needed to ensure
> > proper booting.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Sajna <sajatt...@postmarketos.org>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-lg-common.dtsi | 2 ++
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-lg-judyln.dts | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-lg-common.dtsi
> > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-lg-common.dtsi
> > index
> > 1baec758c7d881026bf6001a0a305687d7a14b40..a513cd931b3a984443183ee4e8df7b0e45732630
> > 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-lg-common.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-lg-common.dtsi
> > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> > * Copyright (c) 2022, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> > */
> >
> > +#include <dt-bindings/arm/qcom,ids.h>
> > #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> > #include <dt-bindings/leds/common.h>
> > #include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-gpio.h>
> > @@ -29,6 +30,7 @@
> >
> > / {
> > chassis-type = "handset";
> > + qcom,msm-id = <QCOM_ID_SDM845 0x20001>;
> >
> > aliases {
> > serial0 = &uart9;
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-lg-judyln.dts
> > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-lg-judyln.dts
> > index
> > 8c1692f86e6ceea7b718361965e78f95d39373bb..beb1372dc6c17f5f06c2044412ee1c8165858cd1
> > 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-lg-judyln.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-lg-judyln.dts
> > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> > / {
> > model = "LG G7 ThinQ";
> > compatible = "lg,judyln", "qcom,sdm845";
> > + qcom,board-id = <0x020C0008 0>;
>
> This is almost QCOM_BOARD_ID(MTP, 12, 0), except for the odd BIT(25)
> which the dt-binding promises should be left unused..
>
> +Stephan maybe you know more?
>
I'm not sure what BIT(25) is exactly, but I think you can generally give
up any hope of trying to make sense of the board IDs of large vendors
like LG, Samsung, Motorola etc. It's a pity that Qualcomm has never
created a board ID scheme with enough room for customization for
vendors. The qcom,board-id scheme seems to be entirely focused just
around Qualcomm's own boards (MTP, QRD, SBC etc). That is why we ended
up with every vendor using their own incompatible approach. :-(
Sorry, I wish I had a better explanation. :-)
Stephan
