On 16/07/2025 13.38, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 07:45:48AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
From: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>
The FSF does not reside in the Franklin street anymore. Let's update
the address with the link to their website, as suggested in the latest
revisions of their licenses.
(See https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.txt for example)
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>
---
LICENSES/deprecated/GPL-1.0 | 6 +++---
LICENSES/preferred/GPL-2.0 | 10 ++++------
LICENSES/preferred/LGPL-2.0 | 5 ++---
LICENSES/preferred/LGPL-2.1 | 8 ++++----
4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/LICENSES/deprecated/GPL-1.0 b/LICENSES/deprecated/GPL-1.0
index 3a4fa969e4c29..8d0a75431f06d 100644
--- a/LICENSES/deprecated/GPL-1.0
+++ b/LICENSES/deprecated/GPL-1.0
@@ -14,7 +14,8 @@ License-Text:
Version 1, February 1989
Copyright (C) 1989 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
- 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
+ <https://fsf.org/>
+
Nit, this change, differs from this one:
--- a/LICENSES/preferred/GPL-2.0
+++ b/LICENSES/preferred/GPL-2.0
@@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ License-Text:
GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
Version 2, June 1991
- Copyright (C) 1989, 1991 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
- 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
+ Copyright (C) 1989, 1991 Free Software Foundation, Inc.,
+ <https://fsf.org/>
Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies
of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.
Ah, wait, that's what the FSF did on their site, ugh.
How about make this 4 patches, one for each file, include a link to
where each of the changes came from (you only have one link in the
changelog.)
Just to be explicit here.
Ok, can do.
Thomas
