On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 11:44 PM David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> wrote: > > In 2009, we converted a VM_BUG_ON(!pfn_valid(pfn)) to the current > highest_memmap_pfn sanity check in commit 22b31eec63e5 ("badpage: > vm_normal_page use print_bad_pte"), because highest_memmap_pfn was > readily available. > > Nowadays, this is the last remaining highest_memmap_pfn user, and this > sanity check is not really triggering ... frequently. > > Let's convert it to VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!pfn_valid(pfn)), so we can > simplify and get rid of highest_memmap_pfn. Checking for > pfn_to_online_page() might be even better, but it would not handle > ZONE_DEVICE properly. > > Do the same in vm_normal_page_pmd(), where we don't even report a > problem at all ... > > What might be better in the future is having a runtime option like > page-table-check to enable such checks dynamically on-demand. Something > for the future. > > Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
LGTM. Feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Lance Yang <lance.y...@linux.dev> Thanks, Lance