On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 06:53:29PM +0530, Beleswar Prasad Padhi wrote: > > On 5/16/2025 9:15 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > > On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 11:14:38AM +0530, Beleswar Padhi wrote: > > > The rproc_detach() function invokes __rproc_detach() before > > > rproc_unprepare_device(). The __rproc_detach() function sets the > > > rproc->state to "RPROC_DETACHED". > > > > > > However, the TI K3 M4 driver erroneously looks for "RPROC_ATTACHED" > > > state in its .unprepare ops to identify IPC-only mode; which leads to > > > resetting the rproc in detach routine. > > > > > > Therefore, correct the IPC-only mode detection logic to look for > > > "RPROC_DETACHED" in k3_m4_rproc_unprepare() function. > > > > > This driver has been upstream for 9 whole months, it is hard for me to > > believe > > this but was just noticed. Martyn from Collabora should be CC'ed on this, > > and I > > will also need the required R-b/T-b tags. > > > Cc: Martyn Welch martyn.we...@collabora.com > > Requesting Andrew/Judith for review and test too. > > > > > Typically bug fixes are not part of refactoring exercises. > > > Typically, yes. But the refactor depends on this fix. This > k3_m4_rproc_unprepare() function is entirely refactored to common driver in > [PATCH v12 26/36]. > > So, If the refactor is picked without this patch fix, the mainline M4 driver > would be fixed, but the older stable kernels would always have this bug. Let > me know what you think. >
I suggest you send this patch on its own and then the series (without this patch) with a note in the cover letter that it depends on the fix. That way we get the best of both worlds. > Thanks, > Beleswar > > > I suggest to apply > > this set without this patch - you can then work on fixing this bug. > > > > Thanks, > > Mathieu > > > > > Fixes: ebcf9008a895 ("remoteproc: k3-m4: Add a remoteproc driver for M4F > > > subsystem") > > > Signed-off-by: Beleswar Padhi <b-pa...@ti.com> > > > --- > > > v12: Changelog: > > > 1. New patch. Fixup a state detection logic. > > > > > > drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c > > > b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c > > > index a16fb165fcedd..6cd50b16a8e82 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c > > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c > > > @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ static int k3_m4_rproc_unprepare(struct rproc *rproc) > > > int ret; > > > /* If the core is going to be detached do not assert the module > > > reset */ > > > - if (rproc->state == RPROC_ATTACHED) > > > + if (rproc->state == RPROC_DETACHED) > > > return 0; > > > ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci, > > > -- > > > 2.34.1 > > >