On Fri, May 2, 2025 at 10:40 AM Tanmay Shah <tanmay.s...@amd.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hello Rob,
>
> Thanks for the patch. Please find my comments below.
>
>
> On 4/23/25 2:42 PM, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> > Use the newly added of_reserved_mem_region_to_resource() and
> > of_reserved_mem_region_count() functions to handle "memory-region"
> > properties.
> >
> > The error handling is a bit different in some cases. Often
> > "memory-region" is optional, so failed lookup is not an error. But then
> > an error in of_reserved_mem_lookup() is treated as an error. However,
> > that distinction is not really important. Either the region is available
> > and usable or it is not. So now, it is just
> > of_reserved_mem_region_to_resource() which is checked for an error.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <r...@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > v2:
> > - Use strstarts instead of strcmp for resource names as they include
> > the unit-address.
> > - Drop the unit-address from resource name for imx and st drivers
> > ---
> > drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c | 45 ++++++++------------
> > drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 68
> > ++++++++++++------------------
> > drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c | 24 ++++-------
> > drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c | 60 +++++++++------------------
> > drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c | 69
> > +++++++++++--------------------
> > drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_wcss.c | 25 +++++------
> > drivers/remoteproc/qcom_wcnss.c | 23 ++++-------
> > drivers/remoteproc/rcar_rproc.c | 36 +++++++---------
> > drivers/remoteproc/st_remoteproc.c | 41 +++++++++---------
> > drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 44 +++++++++-----------
> > drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c | 28 +++++--------
> > drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c | 28 +++++--------
> > drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c | 28 +++++--------
> > drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c | 51 +++++++++--------------
> > 14 files changed, 221 insertions(+), 349 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
> > b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
> > index 90cb1fc13e71..fffae6ff4a5c 100644
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
> > b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
> > index 5aeedeaf3c41..b73e97074c01 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
> > @@ -460,49 +460,44 @@ static int add_mem_regions_carveout(struct rproc
> > *rproc)
> > {
> > struct rproc_mem_entry *rproc_mem;
> > struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
> > - struct of_phandle_iterator it;
> > - struct reserved_mem *rmem;
> > int i = 0;
> >
> > r5_core = rproc->priv;
> >
> > /* Register associated reserved memory regions */
> > - of_phandle_iterator_init(&it, r5_core->np, "memory-region", NULL, 0);
> > + while (1) {
> > + int err;
> > + struct resource res;
> >
> > - while (of_phandle_iterator_next(&it) == 0) {
> > - rmem = of_reserved_mem_lookup(it.node);
> > - if (!rmem) {
> > - of_node_put(it.node);
> > - dev_err(&rproc->dev, "unable to acquire
> > memory-region\n");
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > - }
> > + err = of_reserved_mem_region_to_resource(r5_core->np, i++,
> > &res);
>
> Here i++ is not needed as it's done at the end of the loop.
> This bug breaks RPMsg communication on zynqmp platform.
Thanks for debugging it. I'll fix that up.
Rob
