> > On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 06:53:32AM +0000, Reshetova, Elena wrote: > > 2. Switch to Sean's approach to execute EUPDATESVN during the > sgx_open(). > > Btw, Sean do you agree that we don't gain much doing it second time during > > release() given the microcode flow? > > I would rather leave only one invocation of eupdatesvn during > sgx_inc_usage_count(). > > > > Proc: No new uABI. More predictable on svn change compared to option 1. > > > Cons: Two explicit paths to hook: sgx_open() and sgx_vepc_open(). > > Why this is a con?
Well, just from the pov of not having a single path to enable. Are you ok with option 2? Best Regards, Elena.
