On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 06:53:32AM +0000, Reshetova, Elena wrote: > 2. Switch to Sean's approach to execute EUPDATESVN during the sgx_open(). > Btw, Sean do you agree that we don't gain much doing it second time during > release() given the microcode flow? > I would rather leave only one invocation of eupdatesvn during > sgx_inc_usage_count(). > > Proc: No new uABI. More predictable on svn change compared to option 1.
> Cons: Two explicit paths to hook: sgx_open() and sgx_vepc_open(). Why this is a con? BR, Jarkko