On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 06:53:32AM +0000, Reshetova, Elena wrote:
> 2. Switch to Sean's approach to execute EUPDATESVN during the sgx_open().
> Btw, Sean do you agree that we don't gain much doing it second time during
> release() given the microcode flow?
> I would rather leave only one invocation of eupdatesvn during 
> sgx_inc_usage_count().
> 
> Proc: No new uABI. More predictable on svn change compared to option 1.

> Cons: Two explicit paths to hook: sgx_open() and sgx_vepc_open(). 

Why this is a con?

BR, Jarkko

Reply via email to