On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 05:01:43PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> +static __attribute__((unused))
> +FILE *fopen(const char *pathname, const char *mode)
> +{
> +     int flags, fd;
> +
> +     if (!strcmp(mode, "r"))
> +             flags = O_RDONLY;
> +     else if (!strcmp(mode, "w"))
> +             flags = O_WRONLY | O_CREAT | O_TRUNC;
> +     else if (!strcmp(mode, "a"))
> +             flags = O_WRONLY | O_CREAT | O_APPEND;
> +     else if (!strcmp(mode, "r+"))
> +             flags = O_RDWR;
> +     else if (!strcmp(mode, "w+"))
> +             flags = O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_TRUNC;
> +     else if (!strcmp(mode, "a+"))
> +             flags = O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_APPEND;
> +     else {
> +             SET_ERRNO(EINVAL);
> +             return NULL;
> +     }

I'm concerned by the size of the function due to the repeated strcmp()
calls (also I find strcmp()==0 more readable that !strcmp() which I tend
to read as "not string compares").

I have not tried the code below but I think it could cover it in a maybe
lighter way:

        switch (*mode) {
                case 'r": flags = O_RDONLY; break;
                case 'w': flags = O_WRONLY | O_CREAT | O_TRUNC; break;
                case 'a': flags = O_WRONLY | O_CREAT | O_APPEND; break;
                default : SET_ERRNO(EINVAL); return NULL;
        }

        if (mode[1] == '+')
                flags = (flags & ~(O_RDONLY|O_WRONLY)) | O_RDWR;

I think it does the same but should be significantly lighter.

Willy

Reply via email to