On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 04:16:12PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Apr 2025 01:37:05 +0000 Joe Damato wrote:
> > + bin_remote = cfg.remote.deploy(cfg.test_dir / "napi_id_helper")
> > + listen_cmd = f"{bin_remote} {cfg.addr_v['4']} {port}"
> > +
> > + with bkg(listen_cmd, ksft_wait=3) as server:
>
> Sorry, not sure how I misread v2 but you are running the helper locally.
> So you don't have to deploy it to the remote machine :(
OK I can remove that and fix the macro guard for the v4.
> BTW does removing the ksft_wait() from the binary work? Or does it
> cause trouble? Don't think we need to wait for anything in this case.
> With the XSK test we had to wait for the test to do the inspection
> before we unbound. Here once we get the connection we can just exit, no?
I agree that we can just exit, but removing the wait breaks ksft
utils:
# Exception| Traceback (most recent call last):
# Exception| File
"/home/jdamato/code/net-next/tools/testing/selftests/net/lib/py/ksft.py", line
223, in ksft_run
# Exception| case(*args)
# Exception| File
"/home/jdamato/code/net-next/./tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/napi_id.py",
line 13, in test_napi_id
# Exception| with bkg(listen_cmd, ksft_wait=3) as server:
# Exception| File
"/home/jdamato/code/net-next/tools/testing/selftests/net/lib/py/utils.py", line
130, in __exit__
# Exception| return self.process(terminate=self.terminate,
fail=self.check_fail)
# Exception|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
# Exception| File
"/home/jdamato/code/net-next/tools/testing/selftests/net/lib/py/utils.py", line
78, in process
# Exception| os.write(self.ksft_term_fd, b"1")
# Exception| BrokenPipeError: [Errno 32] Broken pipe
LMK how you'd like me to proceed ?
I'm thinking:
- Leave ksft_wait()
- macro guard
- don't deploy helper to remote machine
