> On Apr 5, 2025, at 1:10 PM, Paul E. McKenney <paul...@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 05, 2025 at 07:01:13AM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 4/2/2025 3:17 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 12:19:13PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 2 Apr 2025 16:17:06 GMT, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>>>>> On 2025-03-31 14:03:06 [-0700], Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>>>>> The torture.sh --do-rt command-line parameter is intended to mimic -rt
>>>>>> kernels. Now that CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT is upstream, this commit makes this
>>>>>> mimicking more precise.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Note that testing of RCU priority boosting is disabled in favor
>>>>>> of forward-progress testing of RCU callbacks. If it turns out to be
>>>>>> possible to make kernels built with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT=y to tolerate
>>>>>> testing of both, both will be enabled.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not sure what you point at here: You can build a PREEMPT_RT kernel and
>>>>> RCU boosting is enabled by default. You could disable it if needed.
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, RCU_BOOST has default y if PREEMPT_RT.
>>>>
>>>> Paul, should we be disabling it in the --do-rt script?
>>>
>>> You should have a "rcutorture.test_boost=0" from f2ac55968df2
>>> ("rcutorture: Make torture.sh --do-rt use CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT").
>>>
>>> Plus I just now made additional adjustments based on Sebastian Siewior's
>>> feedback. He is likely to have additional feedback, so this is currently
>>> a "squash!" commit in my tree.
>> Ok, thanks. If you could repost whenever it is ready to the list, I'll pull
>> it.
>
> If there are no complaints by Monday, Pacific Time, I will resend it.
>
>> Also I'm guessing that checkpatch one does not need any changes, but we've to
>> add a reminder to revert it in the future.
>
> I have added a reminder in my usual todo.txt file. I have no objection
> to it being added to a more visible location. On possible place would
> be the RCU Design Documents gdoc, but I will let you guys choose.
Makes sense, I think we should add this and other todo items somewhere - the
location you suggest sounds reasonable to me, I've noted it. I am also
wondering Boqun - are you working on that PR handbook doc patch? If so, please
send for review and inclusion in 6.16 :)
Thanks,
- Joel
>
> Thanx, Paul
