On 25/02/22 05:42PM, ritvikf...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Ritvik Gupta <ritvikf...@gmail.com>
> 
> 1. Close the file descriptor when write fails.
> 2. Introduce 'close_or_die' helper function to
> reduce repetition.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ritvik Gupta <ritvikf...@gmail.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
>     - Fixed formatting
> 
>  .../selftests/mount/unprivileged-remount-test.c    | 14 ++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mount/unprivileged-remount-test.c 
> b/tools/testing/selftests/mount/unprivileged-remount-test.c
> index d2917054fe3a..41d7547c781d 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mount/unprivileged-remount-test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mount/unprivileged-remount-test.c
> @@ -54,6 +54,14 @@ static void die(char *fmt, ...)
>       exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
>  }
>  
> +static void close_or_die(char *filename, int fd)
> +{
> +     if (close(fd) != 0) {
> +             die("close of %s failed: %s\n",
> +             filename, strerror(errno));
> +     }
> +}
> +
>  static void vmaybe_write_file(bool enoent_ok, char *filename, char *fmt, 
> va_list ap)
>  {
>       char buf[4096];
> @@ -79,6 +87,7 @@ static void vmaybe_write_file(bool enoent_ok, char 
> *filename, char *fmt, va_list
>       }
>       written = write(fd, buf, buf_len);
>       if (written != buf_len) {
> +             close_or_die(filename, fd);
>               if (written >= 0) {
>                       die("short write to %s\n", filename);
>               } else {
> @@ -86,10 +95,7 @@ static void vmaybe_write_file(bool enoent_ok, char 
> *filename, char *fmt, va_list
>                               filename, strerror(errno));
>               }
>       }
> -     if (close(fd) != 0) {
> -             die("close of %s failed: %s\n",
> -                     filename, strerror(errno));
> -     }
> +     close_or_die(filename, fd);
>  }
>  
>  static void maybe_write_file(char *filename, char *fmt, ...)
> -- 
> 2.48.1
> 
> 

Closing a file right before a process exits is redundant,
since the kernel will clean it up automatically anyway.
That said, whether doing this as a best practice is arguable.

Cheers,
Seyediman

Reply via email to