On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 11:46 PM Puranjay Mohan <puran...@kernel.org> wrote: > > Song Liu <s...@kernel.org> writes: > > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 6:45 PM Josh Poimboeuf <jpoim...@kernel.org> wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 06:36:04PM -0800, Song Liu wrote: > >> > > > [ 81.261748] copy_process+0xfdc/0xfd58 [livepatch_special_static] > >> > > > >> > > Does that copy_process+0xfdc/0xfd58 resolve to this line in > >> > > copy_process()? > >> > > > >> > > refcount_inc(¤t->signal->sigcnt); > >> > > > >> > > Maybe the klp rela reference to 'current' is bogus, or resolving to the > >> > > wrong address somehow? > >> > > >> > It resolves the following line. > >> > > >> > p->signal->tty = tty_kref_get(current->signal->tty); > >> > > >> > I am not quite sure how 'current' should be resolved. > >> > >> Hm, on arm64 it looks like the value of 'current' is stored in the > >> SP_EL0 register. So I guess that shouldn't need any relocations. > >> > >> > The size of copy_process (0xfd58) is wrong. It is only about > >> > 5.5kB in size. Also, the copy_process function in the .ko file > >> > looks very broken. I will try a few more things. > > > > When I try each step of kpatch-build, the copy_process function > > looks reasonable (according to gdb-disassemble) in fork.o and > > output.o. However, copy_process looks weird in livepatch-special-static.o, > > which is generated by ld: > > > > ld -EL -maarch64linux -z norelro -z noexecstack > > --no-warn-rwx-segments -T ././kpatch.lds -r -o > > livepatch-special-static.o ./patch-hook.o ./output.o > > > > I have attached these files to the email. I am not sure whether > > the email server will let them through. > > I think, I am missing something here, > > I did : > > objdump -Dr livepatch-special-static.o | less > > and > > objdump -Dr output.o | less > > and the disassembly of copy_process() looks exactly same.
Yeah, objdump does show the same disassembly. However, if I open the file with gdb, and do "disassemble copy_process", the one in livepatch-special-static.o looks very weird. Thanks, Song