On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 03:19:44PM -0600, Mike Christie wrote:
> On 1/12/25 11:35 AM, michael.chris...@oracle.com wrote:
> > So I think to fix the issue, we would want to:
> > 
> > 1. move the
> > 
> > memcpy(vs_tpg, vs->vs_tpg, len);
> > 
> > to the end of the function after we do the vhost_scsi_flush. This will
> > be more complicated than the current memcpy though. We will want to
> > merge the local vs_tpg and the vs->vs_tpg like:
> > 
> > for (i = 0; i < VHOST_SCSI_MAX_TARGET; i++) {
> >     if (vs_tpg[i])
> >             vs->vs_tpg[i] = vs_tpg[i])
> > }
> 
> I think I wrote that in reverse. We would want:
> 
> vhost_scsi_flush(vs);
> 
> if (vs->vs_tpg) {
>       for (i = 0; i < VHOST_SCSI_MAX_TARGET; i++) {
>               if (vs->vs_tpg[i])
>                       vs_tpg[i] = vs->vs_tpg[i])
>       }
> }
> 
> kfree(vs->vs_tpg);
> vs->vs_tpg = vs_tpg;
> 
> or we could just allocate the vs_tpg with the vhost_scsi like:
> 
> struct vhost_scsi {
>       ....
> 
>       struct vhost_scsi_tpg *vs_tpg[VHOST_SCSI_MAX_TARGET];
> 
> then when we loop in vhost_scsi_set/clear_endpoint set/clear the
> every vs_tpg entry.

Wanna post the patch, Mike?

-- 
MST


Reply via email to