On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 10:32:08AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Sat, Nov 02, 2024 at 03:50:37PM -0400, Aren Moynihan wrote: > > Using devm callbacks helps to make the ordering of probe / remove > > operations easier to reason about and removes some duplicate code > > between the probe error path and driver remove. > > Where is SoB?
Oops that got lost in a rebase > ... > > > + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&client->dev, stk3310_set_state_disable, > > data); > > Why not simply 'dev' as in below call? I was trying to avoid refactoring the entire function to replace &client->dev with dev, I'll add a patch for that to the next revision. > > + if (ret) > > + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to register cleanup > > function\n"); > > ... > > > - mutex_init(&data->lock); > > + devm_mutex_init(&client->dev, &data->lock); > > Missed error check, otherwise what's the point? > > > Also can add a temporary variable for 'dev'. Yup, fixing... I need to read the docs / function type more carefully sometimes. Thanks - Aren
