[PATCH] remoteproc: Use of_property_present()

[Rob Herring (Arm)]

Use of_property_present() to test for property presence rather than
of_(find|get)_property(). This is part of a larger effort to remove
callers of of_find_property() and similar functions. of_find_property()
leaks the DT struct property and data pointers which is a problem for
dynamically allocated nodes which may be freed.

Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <r...@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c      | 2 +-
 drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c          | 2 +-
 drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c | 6 +++---
 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c 
b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
index 087506e21508..376187ad5754 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_dsp_rproc.c
@@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ static int imx_dsp_rproc_mbox_alloc(struct imx_dsp_rproc 
*priv)
        struct mbox_client *cl;
        int ret;
 
-       if (!of_get_property(dev->of_node, "mbox-names", NULL))
+       if (!of_property_present(dev->of_node, "mbox-names"))
                return 0;
 
        cl = &priv->cl;
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
index 144c8e9a642e..8d7ecc809c67 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
@@ -807,7 +807,7 @@ static int imx_rproc_xtr_mbox_init(struct rproc *rproc)
        if (priv->tx_ch && priv->rx_ch)
                return 0;
 
-       if (!of_get_property(dev->of_node, "mbox-names", NULL))
+       if (!of_property_present(dev->of_node, "mbox-names"))
                return 0;
 
        cl = &priv->cl;
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c 
b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
index 596f3ffb8935..2cea97c746fd 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
@@ -1059,7 +1059,7 @@ static int zynqmp_r5_core_init(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster 
*cluster,
        r5_core = cluster->r5_cores[0];
 
        /* Maintain backward compatibility for zynqmp by using hardcode TCM 
address. */
-       if (of_find_property(r5_core->np, "reg", NULL))
+       if (of_property_present(r5_core->np, "reg"))
                ret = zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node_from_dt(cluster);
        else if (device_is_compatible(dev, "xlnx,zynqmp-r5fss"))
                ret = zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node(cluster);
@@ -1086,7 +1086,7 @@ static int zynqmp_r5_core_init(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster 
*cluster,
                        return ret;
                }
 
-               if (of_find_property(dev_of_node(dev), "xlnx,tcm-mode", NULL) ||
+               if (of_property_present(dev_of_node(dev), "xlnx,tcm-mode") ||
                    device_is_compatible(dev, "xlnx,zynqmp-r5fss")) {
                        ret = zynqmp_pm_set_tcm_config(r5_core->pm_domain_id,
                                                       tcm_mode);
@@ -1147,7 +1147,7 @@ static int zynqmp_r5_cluster_init(struct 
zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster)
                return -EINVAL;
        }
 
-       if (of_find_property(dev_node, "xlnx,tcm-mode", NULL)) {
+       if (of_property_present(dev_node, "xlnx,tcm-mode")) {
                ret = of_property_read_u32(dev_node, "xlnx,tcm-mode", (u32 
*)&tcm_mode);
                if (ret)
                        return ret;
-- 
2.43.0