Thanks Steve, re-tested in my VM and it's working fine. Just a minor below...
On 13/06/2024 12:55, Steven Rostedt wrote: > [...] > + D. Using a region of memory reserved via ``reserve_mem`` command line > + parameter. The address and size will be defined by the ``reserve_mem`` > + parameter. Note, that ``reserve_mem`` may not always allocate memory > + in the same location, and cannot be relied upon. Testing will need > + to be done, and it may not work on every machine, nor every kernel. > + Consider this a "best effort" approach. The ``reserve_mem`` option > + takes a size, alignment and name as arguments. The name is used > + to map the memory to a label that can be retrieved by ramoops. > + > + reserver_mem=2M:4096:oops ramoops.mem_name=oops > + Likely this could be fixed on merge, to avoid another version, but... s/reserver_mem/reserve_mem Cheers!
