On 6/4/24 16:42, Qais Yousef wrote: > - (wakeup_rt && !dl_task(p) && !rt_task(p)) || > + (wakeup_rt && !realtime_task(p)) ||
I do not like bikeshedding, and no hard feelings... But rt is a shortened version of realtime, and so it is making *it less* clear that we also have DL here. I know we can always read the comments, but we can do without changes as well... I would suggest finding the plural version for realtime_task()... so we know it is not about the "rt" scheduler, but rt and dl schedulers. -- Daniel
