Tigran Aivazian wrote: > On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Dmitri Vorobiev wrote: >> - inode->i_mtime = inode->i_atime = inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME_SEC; >> + inode->i_mtime = CURRENT_TIME_SEC; >> + inode->i_atime = CURRENT_TIME_SEC; >> + inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME_SEC; > > multiple assignments like "x = y = z = value;" can potentially > (depending on the compiler and arch) be faster than "x = value; y = > value; z=value;" > > I am surprized that this script complains about them as it is a > perfectly valid thing to do in C.
I think it seems wise to ask the maintainers of checkpatch.pl to comment on that. I'm Cc:ing them now. Thanks, Dmitri -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
