Christoph Rohland wrote: > As of 2.4.1-pre we pin the pages by increasing the page count for > locked segments. No special list needed. Sure no special list is needed. But without a special list to park those pages on they will just circulate on the active/inactive lists, wasting CPU cycles and trashing cache. A special list would be an improvement, but is no burning issue. -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Christoph Rohland
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Christoph Rohland
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Christoph Rohland
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Linus Torvalds
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Daniel Phillips
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Rik van Riel
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Christoph Rohland
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Daniel Phillips
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Linus Torvalds
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Linus Torvalds
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Christoph Rohland
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Linus Torvalds
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Christoph Rohland
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Tim Wright