Hi Stephen,
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> But again, how do you clear the bit? Locking is a per-vma property,
> not per-page. I can mmap a file twice and mlock just one of the
> mappings. If you get a munlock(), how are you to know how many
> other locked mappings still exist?
It's worse: The issue we are talking about is SYSV IPC_LOCK. This is a
per segment thing. A user can (un)lock a segment at any time. But we
do not have the references to the vmas attached to the segemnts or to
the pages allocated.
Greetings
Christoph
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Sergey E. Volkov
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Rik van Riel
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Linus Torvalds
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Rik van Riel
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Christoph Rohland
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0 ? Christoph Rohland
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2.4.0... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2... Christoph Rohland
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2... Christoph Rohland
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2... Linus Torvalds
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2... Daniel Phillips
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2... Rik van Riel
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2... Christoph Rohland
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2... Daniel Phillips
- Re: VM subsystem bug in 2... Linus Torvalds

