On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 12:03:56AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 09:51:03 -0400
> Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, 7 Oct 2023 21:09:00 +0530
> > Atul Kumar Pant <atulpant.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 11:00:46PM +0530, Atul Kumar Pant wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 10:38:19PM +0530, Atul Kumar Pant wrote:  
> > > > > Fixes typo in a function name.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Atul Kumar Pant <atulpant.li...@gmail.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  samples/kprobes/kretprobe_example.c | 2 +-
> > > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/samples/kprobes/kretprobe_example.c 
> > > > > b/samples/kprobes/kretprobe_example.c
> > > > > index cbf16542d84e..ed79fd3d48fb 100644
> > > > > --- a/samples/kprobes/kretprobe_example.c
> > > > > +++ b/samples/kprobes/kretprobe_example.c
> > > > > @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ struct my_data {
> > > > >       ktime_t entry_stamp;
> > > > >  };
> > > > >  
> > > > > -/* Here we use the entry_hanlder to timestamp function entry */
> > > > > +/* Here we use the entry_handler to timestamp function entry */
> > > > >  static int entry_handler(struct kretprobe_instance *ri, struct 
> > > > > pt_regs *regs)
> > > > >  {
> > > > >       struct my_data *data;
> > > > > -- 
> > > > > 2.25.1
> > > > >   
> > > > 
> > > >         Hi all, can someone provide comments on this change.  
> > > 
> > >                   Hi all, can someone please review this change. It has 
> > > been not
> > >                   reviewed for quite some time.
> > 
> > That's because trivial typos in comments are considered very low priority,
> > and are usually only added (if they are ever added) if the maintainer has
> > extra time, which may not be for a while.
> 
> Anyway, let me pick this. I found this in my inbox now. :)

        Thank you. Sorry for the redundant emails for reviewing the change :)
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> > 
> > -- Steve
> 
> 
> -- 
> Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhira...@kernel.org>

Reply via email to