On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 09:51:03AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Oct 2023 21:09:00 +0530
> Atul Kumar Pant <atulpant.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 11:00:46PM +0530, Atul Kumar Pant wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 10:38:19PM +0530, Atul Kumar Pant wrote:
> > > > Fixes typo in a function name.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Atul Kumar Pant <atulpant.li...@gmail.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > samples/kprobes/kretprobe_example.c | 2 +-
> > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/samples/kprobes/kretprobe_example.c
> > > > b/samples/kprobes/kretprobe_example.c
> > > > index cbf16542d84e..ed79fd3d48fb 100644
> > > > --- a/samples/kprobes/kretprobe_example.c
> > > > +++ b/samples/kprobes/kretprobe_example.c
> > > > @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ struct my_data {
> > > > ktime_t entry_stamp;
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > -/* Here we use the entry_hanlder to timestamp function entry */
> > > > +/* Here we use the entry_handler to timestamp function entry */
> > > > static int entry_handler(struct kretprobe_instance *ri, struct pt_regs
> > > > *regs)
> > > > {
> > > > struct my_data *data;
> > > > --
> > > > 2.25.1
> > > >
> > >
> > > Hi all, can someone provide comments on this change.
> >
> > Hi all, can someone please review this change. It has
> > been not
> > reviewed for quite some time.
>
> That's because trivial typos in comments are considered very low priority,
> and are usually only added (if they are ever added) if the maintainer has
> extra time, which may not be for a while.
>
> -- Steve
Thank you Steve for the response. I wasn't aware of this.
