On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 11:48:48AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 11:35 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman > <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 10:14:34PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote: > > > Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> writes: > > > > > > >> Using raw buffer APIs against uuid_t / guid_t. > > > > > > > > So you want to do that, or you do not want to do that? Totally > > > > confused, > > > > > > My understanding is that: > > > 1) generate_random_uuid() use is allegedly bad even though it's in their > > > header, > > > 2) poking directly at the byte array inside uuid_t is bad, even though, > > > again, header. > > > > > > It is, indeed, not ideal. > > > > > > If agreeable, I'll update this patch to the below and respin the whole > > > series. > > > > You are showing that Andy wrote this, when you are the one that did :( > > > Anyway, I've dropped this single patch from the series and applied the > > rest. Feel free to send this patch as a stand-alone one once you have > > the authorship issues sorted out. > > Internally it was proposed by me as well, so authorship is correct.
And I am supposed to know this how? Come on people, you know better than this...
