On Jan 23, 2008 3:41 PM, Ilpo Järvinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, David Miller wrote: > > > From: "Dave Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:44:30 +0800 > > > > > On Jan 22, 2008 6:47 PM, Ilpo Järvinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > [PATCH] [TCP]: debug S+L > > > > > > Thanks, If there's new findings I will let you know. > > > > Thanks for helping with this bug Dave. > > I noticed btw that there thing might (is likely to) spuriously trigger at > WARN_ON(sacked != tp->sacked_out); because those won't be equal when SACK > is not enabled. If that does happen too often, I send a fixed patch for > it, yet, the fact that I print print tp->rx_opt.sack_ok allows > identification of those cases already as it's zero when SACK is not > enabled. > > Just ask if you need the updated debug patch.
Thanks, please send, I would like to get it. > > -- > i. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
