On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 2:55 AM Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote: > > OK, fixed the fails. My tired head made it unconditionally return the > cookie-id of 'current' instead of task. Pushed out an update.
I see you have the per-task and prctl stuff pulled into your tree. I can rebase the compound cookie and cgroup api patches on top if you'd like; not sure if you've already re-ordered it locally. Any other comments on the former? > > > Also, we really need a better name than coretag.c. > > > > Yea, we don't really otherwise use the phrase "tagging". core_sched.c > > is probably too confusing given we have sched/core.c. > > Right, so I tried core_sched and my fingers already hate it as much as > kernel/scftorture.c (which I'd assumed my fingers would get used to > eventually, but noooo). > > Looking at kernel/sched/ C is very overrepresented, so we really don't > want another I think. B, E, G, H, J, K, N, seem to still be available in > the first half of the alphabet. Maybe, bonghits.c, gabbleduck.c ? hardware_vuln.c? Tricky to avoid a C with cpu, core, and cookie :)
