On 3/25/21 7:22 PM, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
>
> s/runtine/runtime/
> s/AQUIRE/ACQUIRE/
> s/seperately/separately/
> s/wont/won\'t/
> s/succesfull/successful/
>
> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhas...@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdun...@infradead.org>
> ---
> Changes from V1:
> Wrongly spelt filename in the subject line, corrected.
>
> ipc/sem.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ipc/sem.c b/ipc/sem.c
> index f6c30a85dadf..0897dac27f43 100644
> --- a/ipc/sem.c
> +++ b/ipc/sem.c
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
> * - two Linux specific semctl() commands: SEM_STAT, SEM_INFO.
> * - undo adjustments at process exit are limited to 0..SEMVMX.
> * - namespace are supported.
> - * - SEMMSL, SEMMNS, SEMOPM and SEMMNI can be configured at runtine by
> writing
> + * - SEMMSL, SEMMNS, SEMOPM and SEMMNI can be configured at runtime by
> writing
> * to /proc/sys/kernel/sem.
> * - statistics about the usage are reported in /proc/sysvipc/sem.
> *
> @@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ static int sysvipc_sem_proc_show(struct seq_file *s, void
> *it);
> * Setting it to a result code is a RELEASE, this is ensured by both a
> * smp_store_release() (for case a) and while holding sem_lock()
> * (for case b).
> - * The AQUIRE when reading the result code without holding sem_lock() is
> + * The ACQUIRE when reading the result code without holding sem_lock() is
> * achieved by using READ_ONCE() + smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep().
> * (case a above).
> * Reading the result code while holding sem_lock() needs no further
> barriers,
> @@ -821,7 +821,7 @@ static inline int check_restart(struct sem_array *sma,
> struct sem_queue *q)
>
> /* It is impossible that someone waits for the new value:
> * - complex operations always restart.
> - * - wait-for-zero are handled seperately.
> + * - wait-for-zero are handled separately.
> * - q is a previously sleeping simple operation that
> * altered the array. It must be a decrement, because
> * simple increments never sleep.
> @@ -1046,7 +1046,7 @@ static void do_smart_update(struct sem_array *sma,
> struct sembuf *sops, int nsop
> * - No complex ops, thus all sleeping ops are
> * decrease.
> * - if we decreased the value, then any sleeping
> - * semaphore ops wont be able to run: If the
> + * semaphore ops won't be able to run: If the
> * previous value was too small, then the new
> * value will be too small, too.
> */
> @@ -2108,7 +2108,7 @@ static long do_semtimedop(int semid, struct sembuf
> __user *tsops,
> queue.dupsop = dupsop;
>
> error = perform_atomic_semop(sma, &queue);
> - if (error == 0) { /* non-blocking succesfull path */
> + if (error == 0) { /* non-blocking successful path */
> DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
>
> /*
> --
--
~Randy
