Andrew Clausen writes: > can anyone remember why we have partition IDs? Partition IDs are not necessary. Linux works fine when you have no partition table at all, and have a parttab file in an initrd disk telling the kernel where the partitions are supposed to be. No kernel changes required. Today you do not need partition IDs. Today you can dynamically add and delete partitions, without involving anything like a partition table. But people use various schemes to partition their disks, mainly because also other operating systems like DOS or MacOS use the same disks. In such a situation it is useful to agree with the other OS on where the partitions are. Andries - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Andrew Clausen
- Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Russell King
- Re: Partition IDs in the New World... Andrew Clausen
- Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Partition IDs in the New World... Andreas Dilger
- Re: Partition IDs in the New W... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Partition IDs in the New W... Matt D. Robinson
- Re: Partition IDs in the New W... Andreas Dilger
- Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Glenn McGrath
- Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Jason Venner
- Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Andries . Brouwer
- Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Mark I Manning IV
- Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Andries . Brouwer
- Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Andries . Brouwer
- Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Andrew Clausen
- Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Andrew Clausen
- Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Glenn McGrath
- Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Andrew Clausen
- Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Andries . Brouwer