Bryan Henderson wrote: > Allow me to reword to what you probably meant: Have a partition > ID that means "generic partition - check signatures within for > details." (And then get people who develop file systems for use > with Linux, at least, to have a policy of always using that). OK. > Incidentally, I just realized that the common name "partition ID" > for this value is quite a misnomer. As far as I know, it has > never identified the partition, but rather described its contents. Yes, "partition type ID" is better. Andrew Clausen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Partition IDs in the New W... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Partition IDs in the New W... Matt D. Robinson
- Re: Partition IDs in the New W... Andreas Dilger
- Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Glenn McGrath
- Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Jason Venner
- Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Andries . Brouwer
- Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Mark I Manning IV
- Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Andries . Brouwer
- Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Andries . Brouwer
- Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Andrew Clausen
- Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Andrew Clausen
- Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Glenn McGrath
- Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Andrew Clausen
- Re: Partition IDs in the New World TM Andries . Brouwer