On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 02:12:10PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 3/18/21 9:16 AM, Colin King wrote: > > From: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com> > > > > The 3rd argument to alloc_workqueue should be the max_active count, > > however currently it is the lo->lo_number that is intended for the > > loop%d number. Fix this by adding in the missing max_active count. > > Dan, please fold this (or something similar) in when you're redoing the > series. > > -- > Jens Axboe >
Will do.
