On 3/9/21 5:06 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Reword the subsystem bindings section to make sense, from a grammatical
> point of view.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+rene...@glider.be>

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdun...@infradead.org>

Thanks.

> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst 
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst
> index 68129ff09967d5d7..1d11c25249ff5465 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst
> @@ -75,8 +75,8 @@ II. For kernel maintainers
>       binding, and it hasn't received an Acked-by from the devicetree
>       maintainers after a few weeks, go ahead and take it.
>  
> -     Subsystem bindings (anything affecting more than a single device)
> -     then getting a devicetree maintainer to review it is required.
> +     For subsystem bindings (anything affecting more than a single device),
> +     getting a devicetree maintainer to review it is required.
>  
>    3) For a series going though multiple trees, the binding patch should be
>       kept with the driver using the binding.
> 


-- 
~Randy

Reply via email to