On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 05:02:12PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> We have (historically) different approaches how we identify the type
> of a given fwnode. Let's standardize them across the library code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 28 +++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> index adf55db080d8..484ac92903ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> @@ -3678,11 +3678,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fwnode_gpiod_get_index);
>   */
>  int gpiod_count(struct device *dev, const char *con_id)
>  {
> +     const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = dev_fwnode(dev);

Oy vey, missed to fold the fix to this line. :-(

Should be

        const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = dev ? dev_fwnode(dev) : NULL;


>       int count = -ENOENT;
>  
> -     if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && dev && dev->of_node)
> +     if (is_of_node(fwnode))
>               count = of_gpio_get_count(dev, con_id);
> -     else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI) && dev && ACPI_HANDLE(dev))
> +     else if (is_acpi_node(fwnode))
>               count = acpi_gpio_count(dev, con_id);
>  
>       if (count < 0)
> @@ -3820,18 +3821,17 @@ struct gpio_desc *__must_check gpiod_get_index(struct 
> device *dev,
>       int ret;
>       /* Maybe we have a device name, maybe not */
>       const char *devname = dev ? dev_name(dev) : "?";
> +     const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = dev ? dev_fwnode(dev) : NULL;
>  
>       dev_dbg(dev, "GPIO lookup for consumer %s\n", con_id);
>  
> -     if (dev) {
> -             /* Using device tree? */
> -             if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && dev->of_node) {
> -                     dev_dbg(dev, "using device tree for GPIO lookup\n");
> -                     desc = of_find_gpio(dev, con_id, idx, &lookupflags);
> -             } else if (ACPI_COMPANION(dev)) {
> -                     dev_dbg(dev, "using ACPI for GPIO lookup\n");
> -                     desc = acpi_find_gpio(dev, con_id, idx, &flags, 
> &lookupflags);
> -             }
> +     /* Using device tree? */
> +     if (is_of_node(fwnode)) {
> +             dev_dbg(dev, "using device tree for GPIO lookup\n");
> +             desc = of_find_gpio(dev, con_id, idx, &lookupflags);
> +     } else if (is_acpi_node(fwnode)) {
> +             dev_dbg(dev, "using ACPI for GPIO lookup\n");
> +             desc = acpi_find_gpio(dev, con_id, idx, &flags, &lookupflags);
>       }
>  
>       /*
> @@ -3915,9 +3915,6 @@ struct gpio_desc *fwnode_get_named_gpiod(struct 
> fwnode_handle *fwnode,
>       struct gpio_desc *desc = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>       int ret;
>  
> -     if (!fwnode)
> -             return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> -
>       if (is_of_node(fwnode)) {
>               desc = gpiod_get_from_of_node(to_of_node(fwnode),
>                                             propname, index,
> @@ -3933,7 +3930,8 @@ struct gpio_desc *fwnode_get_named_gpiod(struct 
> fwnode_handle *fwnode,
>  
>               acpi_gpio_update_gpiod_flags(&dflags, &info);
>               acpi_gpio_update_gpiod_lookup_flags(&lflags, &info);
> -     }
> +     } else
> +             return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>  
>       /* Currently only ACPI takes this path */
>       ret = gpiod_request(desc, label);
> -- 
> 2.30.1
> 

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


Reply via email to