> On Mar 3, 2021, at 11:03 AM, Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 01:57:02AM -0800, Nadav Amit wrote: >> From: Nadav Amit <na...@vmware.com> >> >> Userfaultfd self-test fails occasionally, indicating a memory >> corruption. > > It's failing very constantly now for me after I got it run on a 40 cores > system... While indeed not easy to fail on my laptop. >
It fails rather constantly for me, but since nobody else reproduced it,
I was afraid to say otherwise ;-)
>
>> Fixes: 292924b26024 ("userfaultfd: wp: apply _PAGE_UFFD_WP bit")
>> Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <na...@vmware.com>
>>
>> ---
>> v2->v3:
>> * Do not acquire mmap_lock for write, flush conditionally instead [Yu]
>> * Change the fixes tag to the patch that made the race apparent [Yu]
>
> Did you forget about this one? It would still be good to point to
> 09854ba94c6a
> just to show that 5.7/5.8 stable branches shouldn't need this patch as they're
> not prone to the tlb data curruption. Maybe also cc stable with 5.9+?
The fixes tag is wrong, as you say. I will fix it and cc stable with 5.9+.
>
>> * Removing patch to avoid write-protect on uffd unprotect. More
>> comprehensive solution to follow (and avoid the TLB flush as well).
>> ---
>> mm/memory.c | 7 +++++++
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
>> index 9e8576a83147..06da04f98936 100644
>> --- a/mm/memory.c
>> +++ b/mm/memory.c
>> @@ -3092,6 +3092,13 @@ static vm_fault_t do_wp_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>> return handle_userfault(vmf, VM_UFFD_WP);
>> }
>>
>> + /*
>> + * Userfaultfd write-protect can defer flushes. Ensure the TLB
>> + * is flushed in this case before copying.
>> + */
>> + if (userfaultfd_wp(vmf->vma) && mm_tlb_flush_pending(vmf->vma->vm_mm))
>> + flush_tlb_page(vmf->vma, vmf->address);
>> +
>> vmf->page = vm_normal_page(vma, vmf->address, vmf->orig_pte);
>> if (!vmf->page) {
>> /*
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
>
> Thanks for being consistent on fixing this problem.
>
> Maybe it's even better to put that into a "unlikely" to reduce the affect of
> normal do_wp_page as much as possible? But I'll leave it to others.
>
> If with the fixes tag modified:
>
> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com>
Thanks, I will send v4 later today.
Regards,
Nadav
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
