Hello,

Md Sadre Alam <mda...@codeaurora.org> wrote on Mon, 15 Feb 2021
02:47:31 +0530:

> From QPIC version 2.0 onwards new register got added to
> read last codeword. This change will add the READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_n
> register.
> 
> For first three code word READ_LOCATION_n register will be
> use.For last code word READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_n register will be
> use.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Md Sadre Alam <mda...@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> [V5]
>  * Added helper function to update location register value.


Please don't forget the "v5" in the message object.

>  /*
> @@ -1094,11 +1141,16 @@ static void config_nand_page_read(struct 
> qcom_nand_controller *nandc)
>   * before reading each codeword in NAND page.
>   */
>  static void
> -config_nand_cw_read(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc, bool use_ecc)
> +config_nand_cw_read(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc, bool use_ecc, bool 
> last_cw)
>  {
> -     if (nandc->props->is_bam)
> -             write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_0, 4,
> -                           NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
> +     if (nandc->props->is_bam) {
> +             if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && last_cw)
> +                     write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_0, 4,
> +                                   NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
> +             else
> +                     write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_0, 4,
> +                                   NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);

I guess write_reg_dma should be updated as well.


[...]

>  
> -     config_nand_cw_read(nandc, false);
> +     config_nand_cw_read(nandc, false, cw == ecc->steps - 1 ? true : false);
>  
>       read_data_dma(nandc, reg_off, data_buf, data_size1, 0);
>       reg_off += data_size1;
> @@ -1873,18 +1938,31 @@ static int read_page_ecc(struct qcom_nand_host *host, 
> u8 *data_buf,
>  
>               if (nandc->props->is_bam) {
>                       if (data_buf && oob_buf) {
> -                             nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, 0, data_size, 0);
> -                             nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 1, data_size,
> -                                                oob_size, 1);
> +                             if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && i == (ecc->steps - 
> 1)) {

I would like the helper to handle this condition. I would prefer to
avoid yet an extra indentation level.

> +                                     nandc_set_read_loc(chip, i, 0, 0, 
> data_size, 0);
> +                                     nandc_set_read_loc(chip, i, 1, 
> data_size,
> +                                                        oob_size, 1);
> +                             } else {
> +                                     nandc_set_read_loc(chip, i, 0, 0, 
> data_size, 0);
> +                                     nandc_set_read_loc(chip, i, 1, 
> data_size,
> +                                                        oob_size, 1);
> +                             }
>                       } else if (data_buf) {
> -                             nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, 0, data_size, 1);
> +                             if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && i == (ecc->steps - 
> 1))
> +                                     nandc_set_read_loc(chip, i, 0, 0, 
> data_size, 1);
> +                             else
> +                                     nandc_set_read_loc(chip, i, 0, 0, 
> data_size, 1);
>                       } else {
> -                             nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, data_size,
> -                                                oob_size, 1);
> +                             if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && i == (ecc->steps - 
> 1))
> +                                     nandc_set_read_loc(chip, i, 0, 
> data_size,
> +                                                        oob_size, 1);
> +                             else
> +                                     nandc_set_read_loc(chip, i, 0, 
> data_size,
> +                                                        oob_size, 1);
>                       }
>               }
>  
> -             config_nand_cw_read(nandc, true);
> +             config_nand_cw_read(nandc, true, i == ecc->steps - 1 ? true : 
> false);

        i == (ecc->steps - 1)

is already a boolean, you don't need

        "? true : false"

>  
>               if (data_buf)
>                       read_data_dma(nandc, FLASH_BUF_ACC, data_buf,
> @@ -1946,7 +2024,7 @@ static int copy_last_cw(struct qcom_nand_host *host, 
> int page)
>       set_address(host, host->cw_size * (ecc->steps - 1), page);
>       update_rw_regs(host, 1, true);
>  
> -     config_nand_single_cw_page_read(nandc, host->use_ecc);
> +     config_nand_single_cw_page_read(nandc, host->use_ecc, true);

Maybe it's best to just forward the codeword and let the code that
needs to know if it is the last one or not do the comparison.

>  
>       read_data_dma(nandc, FLASH_BUF_ACC, nandc->data_buffer, size, 0);
>  

Thanks,
Miquèl

Reply via email to