On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 02:57:27PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:

> +     /* TYPE C is notification from M core */
> +     if (r_msg->header.type == MSG_TYPE_C) {
> +             if (r_msg->header.cmd == TX_PERIOD_DONE) {

> +             } else if (r_msg->header.cmd == RX_PERIOD_DONE) {

A switch statement would be clearer and more extensible...

> +     /* TYPE B is response msg */
> +     if (r_msg->header.type == MSG_TYPE_B) {
> +             memcpy(&info->r_msg, r_msg, sizeof(struct rpmsg_r_msg));
> +             complete(&info->cmd_complete);
> +     }

...and make this flow clearer for example.  Do we need to warn on
unknown messages?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to