On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 11:52:40AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve: > > [auto build test WARNING on tip/x86/asm] > [also build test WARNING on tip/master linus/master tip/x86/core v5.11-rc6 > next-20210125] > [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. > And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch] > > url: > https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Thomas-Gleixner/x86-irq-64-Inline-irq-stack-switching/20210205-091059 > base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git > 5c99720b28381bb400d4f546734c34ddaf608761 > config: x86_64-randconfig-r026-20210204 (attached as .config) > compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-15) 9.3.0 > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): > # > https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/d91ff58e804175dd59e483c7cf236e1fe66c2187 > git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux > git fetch --no-tags linux-review > Thomas-Gleixner/x86-irq-64-Inline-irq-stack-switching/20210205-091059 > git checkout d91ff58e804175dd59e483c7cf236e1fe66c2187 > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > make W=1 ARCH=x86_64 > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate > Reported-by: kernel test robot <l...@intel.com> > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > >> arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.o: warning: objtool: > >> sysvec_hyperv_reenlightenment()+0x7f: undefined stack state > -- > >> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.o: warning: objtool: > >> sysvec_hyperv_callback()+0x7f: undefined stack state > >> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.o: warning: objtool: > >> sysvec_hyperv_stimer0()+0x7f: undefined stack state
It would help if you'd actually applied the patches to a tree that had the required objtool patches as described in 0/n. Or better yet, don't scrape emails if the 0/n includes a git link which you'll run on anyway.
