Please try with this extra patch:

---
>From 212764c3c15ce859e6f55d2146f450ea4ca6fdb9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 14:27:13 +0100
Subject: nvme-pci: fix 2nd PRP setup in nvme_setup_prp_simple

Use the dma address instead of the bio_vec offset for the arithmetics
to find the address for the 2nd PRP.

Fixes: dff824b2aadb ("nvme-pci: optimize mapping of small single segment 
requests")
Reported-by: Jianxiong Gao <jx...@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
---
 drivers/nvme/host/pci.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
index 30e45f7e0f750c..4ae51735d72f4a 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
@@ -808,8 +808,7 @@ static blk_status_t nvme_setup_prp_simple(struct nvme_dev 
*dev,
                struct bio_vec *bv)
 {
        struct nvme_iod *iod = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
-       unsigned int offset = bv->bv_offset & (NVME_CTRL_PAGE_SIZE - 1);
-       unsigned int first_prp_len = NVME_CTRL_PAGE_SIZE - offset;
+       dma_addr_t next_prp;
 
        iod->first_dma = dma_map_bvec(dev->dev, bv, rq_dma_dir(req), 0);
        if (dma_mapping_error(dev->dev, iod->first_dma))
@@ -817,8 +816,9 @@ static blk_status_t nvme_setup_prp_simple(struct nvme_dev 
*dev,
        iod->dma_len = bv->bv_len;
 
        cmnd->dptr.prp1 = cpu_to_le64(iod->first_dma);
-       if (bv->bv_len > first_prp_len)
-               cmnd->dptr.prp2 = cpu_to_le64(iod->first_dma + first_prp_len);
+       next_prp = round_down(iod->first_dma + bv->bv_len, NVME_CTRL_PAGE_SIZE);
+       if (next_prp > iod->first_dma)
+               cmnd->dptr.prp2 = cpu_to_le64(next_prp);
        return BLK_STS_OK;
 }
 
-- 
2.29.2

Reply via email to