> On Jan 31, 2021, at 1:30 PM, Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org> > wrote: > > Btw Kyle, do you have a good simple test-case for this? Clearly this > is some weird special case use, and regular single-stepping works > fine. > > Indeed, and I have tests for this. TBH, the TIF_SINGLESTEP code makes no sense, and I think it has at least three overloaded meanings. I can try to look in a bit. I’ve mostly avoided breaking it in the past, but that doesn’t mean I understand the original intent.
- [REGRESSION] x86/entry: TIF_SINGLESTEP handling is... Kyle Huey
- Re: [REGRESSION] x86/entry: TIF_SINGLESTEP ha... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [REGRESSION] x86/entry: TIF_SINGLESTE... Kyle Huey
- Re: [REGRESSION] x86/entry: TIF_SINGL... Yuxuan Shui
- Re: [REGRESSION] x86/entry: TIF_S... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [REGRESSION] x86/entry: ... Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
- Re: [REGRESSION] x86/ent... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [REGRESSION] x86/entry: TIF_SINGL... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [REGRESSION] x86/entry: TIF_S... Andy Lutomirski
- Re: [REGRESSION] x86/entry: ... Kyle Huey
- Re: [REGRESSION] x86/ent... Andy Lutomirski
- Re: [REGRESSION] x86... Kyle Huey
- Re: [REGRESSION] x86... Kyle Huey
- Re: [REGRESSION] x86... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [REGRESSION] x86... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [REGRESSION] x86... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [REGRESSION] x86... Andy Lutomirski
- Re: [REGRESSION] x86... Kyle Huey
- Re: [REGRESSION] x86... Andy Lutomirski