Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):

 drivers/thunderbolt/dma_port.c: In function ‘dma_port_flash_write_block’:
 drivers/thunderbolt/dma_port.c:331:6: warning: variable ‘ret’ set but not used 
[-Wunused-but-set-variable]

Cc: Andreas Noever <andreas.noe...@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Jamet <michael.ja...@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Yehezkel Bernat <yehezkel...@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/thunderbolt/dma_port.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thunderbolt/dma_port.c b/drivers/thunderbolt/dma_port.c
index 847dd07a7b172..5aced91e17dc4 100644
--- a/drivers/thunderbolt/dma_port.c
+++ b/drivers/thunderbolt/dma_port.c
@@ -328,13 +328,12 @@ static int dma_port_flash_write_block(struct tb_dma_port 
*dma, u32 address,
 {
        struct tb_switch *sw = dma->sw;
        u32 in, dwaddress, dwords;
-       int ret;
 
        dwords = size / 4;
 
        /* Write the block to MAIL_DATA registers */
-       ret = dma_port_write(sw->tb->ctl, buf, tb_route(sw), dma->port,
-                           dma->base + MAIL_DATA, dwords, DMA_PORT_TIMEOUT);
+       dma_port_write(sw->tb->ctl, buf, tb_route(sw), dma->port,
+                      dma->base + MAIL_DATA, dwords, DMA_PORT_TIMEOUT);
 
        in = MAIL_IN_CMD_FLASH_WRITE << MAIL_IN_CMD_SHIFT;
 
-- 
2.25.1

Reply via email to