>From your previous mail >You need to actually boot the kernel to get effective reports from >lockdep, it'll build just fine.
I will post the config file and dmesg with lockdep messages after a while. On Dec 29, 2007 9:57 AM, Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, 2007-12-29 at 09:52 +0800, Dave Young wrote: > > > Hm, actually it's not so hard, but If I resend the 12 patches seems > > like spam to lkml :-). > > > > Of cource, if you all don't mind and it is really needed, I will do that. > > As it stands now I'm quite convinced these patches will make lockdep > scream bloody murder, so these patches would need quite some more work > before they're usable. > > > > > > > Also, I don't think your series is bisectable, ie. 1/12 changes > > > device::sem -> device::mutex, and 12/12 changes a user of it. > > > > Sorry, I don't use git tools now. Could you tell me how to fix it? > > thanks in advance. > > Just ensure that the kernel builds after each applied patch. If you're > using quilt, something like: > > while (quilt push && make) > should finish the whole series. > Thanks a lot. Regards dave > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
