On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > I agree, it's device dependent, but such hardware exists. > > > > Show me any practical case where the hardware actually exists. > > http://www.augan.com > > > I do not know of _any_ disk controllers that let you map the controller > > buffers over PCI. Which means that with current hardware, you have to > > assume that the disk is the initiator of the PCI-PCI DMA requests. Agreed? Err, first-party DMA devices do this, I think. I do have some of these on the radar map. Andre Hedrick Linux ATA Development - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Russell Leighton
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Larry McVoy
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Roman Zippel
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Roman Zippel
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Alan Cox
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Roman Zippel
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Andre Hedrick
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? kuznet
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? kuznet
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Roman Zippel
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Roman Zippel
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? kuznet
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? David Woodhouse
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Kai Henningsen