> Which in turn implies that the non-disk target hardware has to be able to > have a PCI-mapped memory buffer for the source or the destination, AND > they have to be able to cope with the fact that the data you get off the > disk will have to be the raw data at 512-byte granularity. And that the chipset gets it right. Which is a big assumption as tv card driver folks can tell you The pcipci stuff in quirks is only a beginning alas - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Rogier Wolff
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Andreas Dilger
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Russell Leighton
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Larry McVoy
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Roman Zippel
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Roman Zippel
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Alan Cox
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Roman Zippel
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Andre Hedrick
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? kuznet
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? kuznet
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Roman Zippel
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Linus Torvalds
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? Roman Zippel
- Re: Is sendfile all that sexy? kuznet