On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > This is a possible slow (but userspace based) implementation of SIOCPUSH: of course this is what i meant. Lets stop wasting time on this, ok? Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] kuznet
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Olivier Galibert
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Rick Jones
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] kuznet
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] kuznet
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] kuznet
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] kuznet
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Linus Torvalds
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] kuznet