On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 10:04:28PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > NAGLE algorithm is only one, CORK algorithm is another different algorithm. So > probably it would be not appropriate to mix CORK and NAGLE under the name > "CONTROL_NAGLING", but certainly I agree they could stay together under another > name ;). TCP_FLOW_CONTROL ? OG. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Linus Torvalds
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Linus Torvalds
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] kuznet
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] kuznet
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Olivier Galibert
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Rick Jones
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] kuznet
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] kuznet