On Thursday 20 December 2007 06:29:06 am Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ingo. > > > > commit fbdcf18df73758b2e187ab94678b30cd5f6ff9f9 is not needed. another > > patch (by you !! commit 699d934d5f958d7944d195c03c334f28cc0b3669 x86: > > fixup cpu_info array conversion) already removed clearing of > > c->cpu_index. in identify_cpu > > also it is not consisent to smpboot_32.c. (it will assign id to > > cpu_index right after > > > > *c = boot_cpu_data; > > ) > > well, it might in the worst-case be a superfluous change, but not cause > any problems in 2.6.24, right?
now it is ok with 2.6.24. > > > by revert commit fbdcf18df73758b2e187ab94678b30cd5f6ff9f9, we could > > use c->cpu_index in identify_cpu. > > but that's 2.6.25 stuff, right? Travis? or at least before bewfore merging smpboot_32.c and smpboot_64.c YH -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
