On Donnerstag, 20. Dezember 2007, David Newall wrote: > >>> On Montag, 17. Dezember 2007, you wrote: > >>> > >>> and another one, this time tainted with the nvidia module: > >>> 5194.130985] Unable to handle kernel paging request at 0000030000000000 > >>> RIP: > > Numbers like that don't suggest hardware faults. All those zeros: It's > far too round. Sounds very like software. In fact, it sounds like the > start of significant hardware region. And lo! there's a closed-source, > possibly buggy nvidia module. Try another; older or newer are equally > good.
and this one was without the nvidia module: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=119790371708690&w=2 and the first one I reported, was without nvidia and not-tainted too: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=119776365425514&w=2 I am not a complete idiot. If I have a problem, I try to reproduce without nvidia first (after a clean shutdown and boot, with the module not even on harddisk). And I reproduced it without the module. The last oops with the module was just an example that it does not matter if the module is loaded or not and to (maybe) give some additional information. Glück Auf, Volker -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
